Sweet was the song (Anonymous): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - ".mus|Finale 2000]]" to ".mus|{{mus}}]] (Finale 2000)") |
m (Text replace - "'''Published:'''(.*)" to "{{Published|}}$1") |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{Language|English}} | {{Language|English}} | ||
{{Instruments|4 viols (optional) or A cappella}} | {{Instruments|4 viols (optional) or A cappella}} | ||
{{Published|}} | |||
'''Description:''' A note by {{User|Bobnotts|Robert Nottingham}}: | '''Description:''' A note by {{User|Bobnotts|Robert Nottingham}}: | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 2 September 2016
Music files
| ICON | SOURCE |
|---|---|
 |
File details |
 |
Help |
- CPDL #12348:
(Finale 2000)
- Editor: Sabine_Cassola (submitted 2006-08-21). Score information: A4, 2 pages, 94 kB Copyright: CPDL
- Edition notes: text underlay voice 2-5 by SMC
General Information
Title: Sweet was the song
Composer: Anonymous
Arranger: Sabine Cassola
Number of voices: 1/5vv Voicings: Solo Soprano, SATTB and SAATB
Genre: Sacred, Partsong
Language: English
Instruments: 4 viols (optional) or A cappella
{{Published}} is obsolete (code commented out), replaced with {{Pub}} for works and {{PubDatePlace}} for publications.
Description: A note by Robert Nottingham:
- This arrangement seems to be able to be performed in one of two ways. Either as a soprano solo with 4 viols as accompaniment or as a 5 part song. If it is performed in the second way, the voicing could be either SATTB or SAATB. It seems that the arranger intended for the scoring to be SATTB because the third line down has a treble clef down the octave rather than being notated simply as a treble clef like the second line down. However, it is consistently high in the tenor register so having a scoring of SAATB seems preferable to me.
External websites:
Original text and translations
Original text and translations may be found at Sweet was the song the Virgin sang.