Talk:Scio enim quod Redemptor (Orlando di Lasso): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Might the Matthew Collett edition be better placed under ''Pelli meae'' (1565) and labeled ''tertia pars?'' Pages 7–9 of the Potham...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Might the Matthew Collett edition be better placed under [[Pelli_meae_(1565)_(Orlando_di_Lasso)|''Pelli meae'' (1565)]] and labeled ''tertia pars?'' Pages 7–9 of the | Might the Matthew Collett edition be better placed under [[Pelli_meae_(1565)_(Orlando_di_Lasso)|''Pelli meae'' (1565)]] and labeled ''tertia pars?'' Pages 7–9 of the Pothárn Imre edition appear to justify such a move. | ||
di Lasso's standalone four-part setting of ''Scio enim'' (1568, no. 51; 1579, no. 68) sets Job 19:25–26 only. Sadly I haven't access to the 1563 and 1977 editions listed on the page. | di Lasso's standalone four-part setting of ''Scio enim'' (1568, no. 51; 1579, no. 68) sets Job 19:25–26 only. Sadly I haven't access to the 1563 and 1977 editions listed on the page. | ||
[[User:Aristotle|Aristotle]] ([[User talk:Aristotle|talk]]) 18:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC) | [[User:Aristotle|Aristotle]] ([[User talk:Aristotle|talk]]) 18:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 11 July 2019
Might the Matthew Collett edition be better placed under Pelli meae (1565) and labeled tertia pars? Pages 7–9 of the Pothárn Imre edition appear to justify such a move.
di Lasso's standalone four-part setting of Scio enim (1568, no. 51; 1579, no. 68) sets Job 19:25–26 only. Sadly I haven't access to the 1563 and 1977 editions listed on the page.